Currently Governance not used.

Other ways to earn here https://undeads.com/forum/topic/4455/how-to-earn-with-undeads.com

Great write-up! I think the 'hybrid model' you mentioned is the only realistic way forward for the Steam launch. Steam’s policy is basically a 'don't touch the wallet' rule, so having the blockchain layer purely for backend ownership while the front-end feels like a standard Web2 RPG is a smart play. On the rewards side, I’m leaning toward a shift into skill-based incentives. 50% APR is a massive hook for early adopters, but for the game to survive a Steam-level influx of players, the value has to come from the gameplay loop itself, not just the staking contract. Super excited to see how that TON integration looks—managing your Zombie horde via a Telegram mini-app while on the bus sounds like the ultimate 'productive' gaming grind!

[image: 1770010220734-b7eb8062-499a-4ffb-a3ee-1e52223f77db-image.png] We're at $80,252 watching one of those classic market contradictions that separates disciplined traders from emotional ones. Weekly RSI at 18.7 is screaming "bottom," but the structure is screaming something else entirely. Here's how to think three moves ahead instead of reacting to the noise. THE TECHNICAL REALITY • Price rejected violently from $84,599 with a 37.5% upper wick, sellers defended the bearish order block ($97,932-$90,066) with serious intent • Trading in PREMIUM zone (Smart Money Concepts) where institutions typically sell, not buy • Lower high formation confirms bearish structure is taking control despite "bullish" swing trend label • MACD deeply bearish at -5,482, price below EMA20 ($95,230) and EMA50 ($96,374) THE INDICATORS ️ Bearish Signals: • ADX at 48.1 = strong downtrend conviction (trends with this strength don't just roll over) • MACD at -5,482 showing deep bearish momentum • Bearish FVG between $98,888-$96,012 remains unfilled (magnet for any relief rally) • MFI at 35.6 showing weak money flow Bullish Signals: • RSI at 18.7 and Stochastic at 0.5 = extreme weekly oversold readings • Still above EMA200 at $68,515 on macro view • Volume at average levels ($987,996) = no panic capitulation yet The Conflict: Extreme oversold readings create the possibility of reversal, but structure must confirm first. Right now, structure remains bearish. Strong trends don't reverse just because an indicator hits an extreme, they need structural breaks. THE TRADE SETUP Scenario A: Continuation Lower (Primary) • Trigger: Continued rejection from $80,000-$84,000 zone, failure to reclaim $97,932 • Entry: Confirmed rejection at bearish OB with stop above $97,932 • Target 1: $74,457 (7.2% downside) - top of bullish order block, last major defense • Target 2: $68,587 (15% downside) - high volume node from accumulation zone • Extended Targets: $65,157 and $61,728 if $74,457 breaks on 4H close 🟢 Scenario B: Structural Reversal (Alternative) • Trigger: $74,457 tested with volume showing accumulation signs • Entry: Bounce confirmation from $74,457 support zone • Stop: Below $70,000 • Invalidation: 4H close above $97,932 (reclaims bearish OB, flips structure bullish) MY VERDICT Risk-reward favors waiting. The meta-game here is recognizing that extreme oversold on weekly doesn't mean immediate reversal, it means reversal becomes possible IF structure confirms. Until $74,457 is tested or $97,932 is reclaimed, path of least resistance remains down. Confidence: 72% bearish.

[image: 1770010396454-794d2b87-c992-4d0e-a49d-1ab43b36d305-image.png] Analysts say a full liquidation of BitMine’s Ethereum holdings would likely overwhelm the market. Selling more than 4 million ETH — even gradually — would introduce supply far beyond what typical order books are built to absorb. Historical examples show that far smaller “whale” liquidations have caused 10–30% price drops within hours. In BitMine’s case, forced selling could push ETH down another 20–40%, according to market depth estimates. Slippage alone could reduce proceeds by billions, meaning BitMine might realize only $5–7 billion from assets currently marked near $10 billion. As a result, selling is widely viewed as a last-resort option rather than a viable exit strategy.

[image: 1770011366455-69471304-2acc-4bc6-aaba-04b5113528a5-image.png] Precious metals markets experienced a historic liquidation over the past 48 hours, wiping out roughly $7 trillion in combined value as gold and silver prices collapsed. Gold fell more than 8%, dropping from around $5,600 an ounce to near $4,700, while silver plunged over 25%, sliding from $121 to roughly $77. By contrast, Bitcoin declined about 7% but avoided the kind of forced selling seen in metals. Analyst Joe Consorti noted that the losses in gold and silver equaled nearly four times Bitcoin’s entire market capitalization, highlighting the scale of the divergence. Data providers described Bitcoin’s relative stability as unusual during such a broad macro-driven sell-off.

[image: 1770011694124-db071402-c3ad-4cde-a262-b2cf90fbd828-image.png] Some scholars argue Elon Musk’s rise resembles less a classic corporate conglomerate and more a modern version of Gilded Age power consolidation. Harvard Business School professor David Yoffie likens Musk to figures like John D. Rockefeller, who used wealth, influence, and loose regulation to shape entire industries. While Musk’s companies increasingly collaborate — from Tesla batteries powering AI data centers to shared investments in xAI — critics warn that merging them could trigger a “conglomerate discount” and invite regulatory scrutiny. As Musk spends heavily to influence politics and regulation shifts globally, the long-term question is whether public opinion and regulators will ultimately curb his growing power, as they did with earlier industrial titans.

[image: 1770011900242-3f441db9-2fdb-475b-bff3-625b99758532-image.png] Following January’s largest phishing theft, attackers rapidly converted stolen funds into Monero, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, triggering a surge in XMR’s price and renewing concerns about illicit fund obfuscation. Analysts say the incident highlights the limits of hardware security when user-level defenses fail. Beyond phishing, smart contract vulnerabilities continued to impact DeFi. Truebit lost $26.6 million to an overflow flaw, while Swapnet and other protocols suffered multi-million-dollar breaches. A separate attack on Solana-based Step Finance drained treasury wallets of nearly 262,000 SOL. As February begins, security experts warn that human error remains crypto’s most expensive vulnerability.

[image: 1770012041742-5c24499b-4a03-4b9c-8f32-8f9c1370817e-image.png] The new accusations against Justin Sun come amid ongoing political and regulatory attention. US lawmakers have criticized the SEC for pausing its prior case against Sun, citing his financial ties to Trump family ventures and suggesting potential influence on enforcement decisions. Ten Ten, who claims detailed evidence of TRX price manipulation and insider profit-taking, has appealed for regulatory action and public distancing by political figures. Neither Sun nor Binance has commented on the latest claims, while TRON’s token remains largely stable at $0.2843, down 0.5% in 24 hours. Observers warn that substantiated allegations could prompt renewed investigations into TRON’s early trading practices and regulatory oversight.

[image: 1770010081807-cbe79f8b-cf88-4316-a699-90c473d3e8e9-image.png]

imagine being a trader in hungary right now, one law change and half your services go offline

season 28 is basically your last hurrah on the original switch, might as well grind all the rewards

CZ getting some heat on X

@Nahid-Hossen why do you write Nike

regulators warning against over-reliance on por… feels like common sense but crypto hype never listens