While most traders wrestle with Fibonacci retracements and Bollinger Bands, a growing number are turning their gaze skyward. Welcome to the strange — and surprisingly popular — world of crypto astrology.

A Billion-Dollar Belief System

Astrology and other “psychic services” already generate $2.2 billion annually in the U.S., with forecasts projecting growth to nearly $23 billion by 2031. A Pew study in 2024 found that 28% of Americans consult astrology at least once a year.

Social feeds are now full of “financial astrologers” who claim their higher selves give them an edge in markets. Critics call it pseudoscience — but the movement is too loud to ignore.

Skeptics Say “Moon Phases Belong in Fishing Trips”

Professional crypto day trader Craig Cobb is blunt:

“I would never, ever, EVER trade based on astrology or the moon phase. If anything, I’d rather go fishing on the moon.”

For Cobb and other technical analysts, charts, fundamentals, and liquidity still rule the game.

Meet the Crypto Astrologists

On the flip side, astrologers like Crypto Damus (50k followers on X) insist the stars don’t lie. He claims to have predicted Bitcoin’s three major tops in 2024 and even the sell-off in early 2025 by watching planetary alignments.

Saturn = fear, restriction → bear market signal

Jupiter = growth, abundance → cycle tops

“It definitely works if you know how to use it,” Damus says.

And there’s some academic backing: a University of Michigan study (2006) found stock returns dip around full moons by 3%–5% annually across 48 countries. Another study (2013) suggested lunar phases impact investor sentiment.

️ How Crypto Astrology Works

Astrologers build a natal chart for each crypto asset, similar to how one is made for a person.

For Bitcoin, the “birth” is Jan. 3, 2009 — the timestamp of the genesis block.

They then use an ephemeris to map planetary movements against this natal chart.

Overlaying that with historical market data, astrologists believe they can anticipate future booms and busts.

In short, it’s TA with constellations instead of candlesticks.

Between Stars and Stats

Even if astrology can’t pass strict scientific tests, it clearly shapes real behavior — and markets are nothing if not collective psychology.

Whether you believe Saturn signals a sell-off or you prefer to stick with RSI levels, one thing is clear: traders will use any tool that promises an edge.

While most traders wrestle with Fibonacci retracements and Bollinger Bands, a growing number are turning their gaze skyward. Welcome to the strange — and surprisingly popular — world of crypto astrology.

A Billion-Dollar Belief System

Astrology and other “psychic services” already generate $2.2 billion annually in the U.S., with forecasts projecting growth to nearly $23 billion by 2031. A Pew study in 2024 found that 28% of Americans consult astrology at least once a year.

Social feeds are now full of “financial astrologers” who claim their higher selves give them an edge in markets. Critics call it pseudoscience — but the movement is too loud to ignore.

Skeptics Say “Moon Phases Belong in Fishing Trips”

Professional crypto day trader Craig Cobb is blunt:

“I would never, ever, EVER trade based on astrology or the moon phase. If anything, I’d rather go fishing on the moon.”

For Cobb and other technical analysts, charts, fundamentals, and liquidity still rule the game.

Meet the Crypto Astrologists

On the flip side, astrologers like Crypto Damus (50k followers on X) insist the stars don’t lie. He claims to have predicted Bitcoin’s three major tops in 2024 and even the sell-off in early 2025 by watching planetary alignments.

Saturn = fear, restriction → bear market signal

Jupiter = growth, abundance → cycle tops

“It definitely works if you know how to use it,” Damus says.

And there’s some academic backing: a University of Michigan study (2006) found stock returns dip around full moons by 3%–5% annually across 48 countries. Another study (2013) suggested lunar phases impact investor sentiment.

️ How Crypto Astrology Works

Astrologers build a natal chart for each crypto asset, similar to how one is made for a person.

For Bitcoin, the “birth” is Jan. 3, 2009 — the timestamp of the genesis block.

They then use an ephemeris to map planetary movements against this natal chart.

Overlaying that with historical market data, astrologists believe they can anticipate future booms and busts.

In short, it’s TA with constellations instead of candlesticks.

Between Stars and Stats

Even if astrology can’t pass strict scientific tests, it clearly shapes real behavior — and markets are nothing if not collective psychology.

Whether you believe Saturn signals a sell-off or you prefer to stick with RSI levels, one thing is clear: traders will use any tool that promises an edge.

Hackers have compromised widely used JavaScript libraries in what experts are calling the largest supply chain attack ever recorded, injecting malware designed to steal crypto by swapping wallet addresses and intercepting transactions.

How the Hack Happened

Attackers gained access to a reputable developer’s NPM (Node Package Manager) account through phishing emails disguised as official support.

Once inside, they added malicious code to popular packages such as chalk, strip-ansi, and color-convert.

These libraries, downloaded over 1 billion times per week, are buried deep in countless app dependency trees — meaning even devs who never installed them directly may be exposed.

🪤 What the Malware Does

The injected code acts as a crypto-clipper:

It silently replaces wallet addresses during transactions.

Users relying only on software wallets are most vulnerable.

Hardware wallet users are protected, since they must confirm the final details on a physical device.

Ledger CTO Charles Guillemet warned:

“The affected packages have already been downloaded over 1 billion times, meaning the entire JavaScript ecosystem may be at risk.”

️ What Users Should Do

According to DefiLlama founder Oxngmi, the malware won’t auto-drain wallets — but if you hit “swap” or approve a transaction on an affected site, it may redirect funds.

Only projects updated after the malicious code was published are at risk, but since users can’t easily check which sites are safe, security experts recommend avoiding crypto transactions until fixes are deployed.

🧑‍ Why It’s So Dangerous

This hack goes far beyond simple code injection:

It can alter website content,

Tamper with API calls, and

Manipulate what apps display to users before they sign a transaction.

Security researcher Charlie Eriksen noted:

“The attack operated at multiple layers, making it one of the most dangerous supply chain compromises we’ve ever seen.”

Takeaway: If you’re moving funds, use a hardware wallet and double-check every transaction detail. For now, treat most web-based crypto apps with extra caution until developers confirm they’ve cleaned their dependencies.

The age profile of Silicon Valley’s tech giants is shifting dramatically. According to Fortune citing Pave data, the share of Gen Z employees (ages 21–25) in major tech firms has dropped from 15% to just 6.8% in two years, while the average employee age has jumped from 34.3 to 39.4 years.

What’s Happening?

Entry-level jobs are vanishing. Companies are cutting junior roles as automation and AI handle more routine tasks.

Older workers are staying put. Experienced employees, especially in management, remain essential since leadership and strategy are still beyond AI’s capabilities.

As Matt Schulman, CEO of Pave, explains: “There’s still a lot of human input at the leadership level.”

️ Long-Term Risk

While AI boosts efficiency, experts warn this trend could slow innovation over time:

With fewer young workers entering today, there may be a talent gap in 10–20 years when today’s mid-levels move into leadership.

Without a pipeline of fresh talent, innovation could stagnate.

What Young Professionals Need Now

To stay competitive in an AI-driven era, young workers must:

Be obsessively focused on mastering the latest AI models.

Learn to fine-tune and adapt models for specialized tasks.

Build credentials: Employers increasingly value certifications and course diplomas over traditional degrees or years of experience.

The message is clear: AI is reshaping not only products but the very structure of Silicon Valley’s workforce. For young talent, the future belongs to those who can train the machines, not be replaced by them.

According to Reuters citing Cox Automotive, Tesla’s share of the U.S. electric vehicle market slipped below 40% in August 2025 — its lowest level since 2017.

The Numbers

Tesla sales in July 2025: 53,800 units (+7% MoM)

U.S. EV market in July: 128,200 units (+24% MoM)

Tesla sales in August: –3.1% decline

U.S. EV market in August: +14% growth

So, while Tesla is still growing, the overall EV market is expanding much faster, diluting its dominance.

Why the Drop?

Analysts point to intensifying competition:

Rivals are aggressively rolling out new EV models.

Discounts and incentives are drawing buyers away from Tesla.

Meanwhile, Tesla has shifted its focus toward robotaxis and humanoid robots, delaying plans for new models and cheaper EVs.

Profit Pressure Ahead

Tesla’s auto business remains its primary revenue driver, but:

Price cuts are necessary to maintain sales volume.

Analysts warn this could squeeze margins and reduce profitability.

Tesla still leads the EV market, but its dominance is fading. The question now: can innovation in AI-driven mobility and robotics offset the pressure from cheaper, faster-released EVs by competitors?

Binance has announced its 37th HODLer Airdrops project, spotlighting Linea (LINEA) — a zkEVM-powered layer-2 rollup built to scale Ethereum.

Key Details

Eligible users: BNB holders in Simple Earn (Aug. 25–28 snapshot)

Distribution: 720,099,900 LINEA (≈1% of supply)

Total supply: 72,009,990,000 LINEA

Circulating at launch: ~15.48B (≈21.5%)

Listing date: Sept. 10 at 4 p.m. UTC

Trading pairs: LINEA/USDT, LINEA/USDC, LINEA/BNB, LINEA/FDUSD, LINEA/TRY

Deposits open: Sept. 9 at 2 p.m. UTC

Additional allocations:

180M LINEA for post-listing marketing

360M LINEA to be released six months later

Both will be distributed via separate campaigns.

️ About Linea

Built as a zkEVM layer-2, Linea combines Ethereum-level security with faster, cheaper transactions.

Designed to reduce congestion on Ethereum and scale dApps seamlessly.

🪂 Binance HODLer Airdrops Explained

This program rewards historical BNB holders with retroactive airdrops. Eligibility is based on hourly balance snapshots across Simple Earn and On-Chain Yields, rather than requiring active participation.

️ Note: KYC is required, and residents of the U.S., U.K., Canada, and Australia are excluded.

Trading Rollout

Initial trading will launch on Binance Alpha, with transfers to Spot enabled within 24 hours.

Features at launch: Spot Algo Orders, Trading Bots, and Copy Trading.

Why It Matters

Linea joins a growing list of Ethereum Layer-2 scaling solutions gaining institutional traction. With zkEVM tech powering faster settlements and strong backing from Binance’s liquidity engine, this listing could be one to watch closely.

The decentralized AI project OpenLedger (OPEN) officially launched on mainnet with a bang — its native token soaring 200% shortly after debuting on Binance.

At press time, OPEN trades at $1.52, with trading volume topping $182 million, signaling strong demand behind the rally.

What Is OpenLedger?

OpenLedger positions itself as a next-gen blockchain for AI, aiming to unlock liquidity and monetize data, models, apps, and agents.

The platform enables:

Seamless training and deployment of AI models

On-chain tracking and attribution

Transparent and verifiable data exchange

Core contributor Ram told CCN:

“This listing is a milestone in bringing OpenLedger’s vision of a transparent, accountable AI economy to a global audience.”

Tokenomics and Airdrops

Total supply: 1 billion OPEN

Circulating supply at launch: 215.5M (21.55%)

Airdrops:

10M OPEN distributed at launch via Binance’s HODLer program

15M OPEN scheduled six months later

This phased release is designed to reward early adopters while managing liquidity and community engagement.

Why the Volume Matters

High volume often validates a rally — and OpenLedger’s $182M turnover suggests the price move is fueled by genuine demand, not thin trading.

If momentum continues, analysts see OPEN testing the $2 level in the near term.

️ Price Outlook

OPEN is still in price discovery, meaning volatility is expected:

Bullish case: Sustained demand + limited selling from airdrop recipients could push OPEN toward $2.

Bearish case: Heavy airdrop sell-offs could cap gains and trigger a retrace.

For now, all eyes remain on whether early momentum holds.

As schools reopen this fall, one thing is clear — AI is no longer a side note in education, it’s the main act. With ChatGPT and similar tools now embedded in student workflows, educators are rethinking how to keep learning real.

️ The Challenge: AI as Shortcut vs. AI as Superpower

Since ChatGPT’s release, students have found it easier than ever to “outsource” work. For some teachers, that’s cheating. For others, it’s a teaching moment.

Daniel Myers, associate professor of computer science at Rollins College, warns:

“The biggest challenge of AI is that it breaks the connection between submitted work and actual learning.”

He’s redesigned his classes so coding assignments happen in-person under supervision, while out-of-class tasks are now bigger, creative projects where AI use is guided rather than banned.

John von Seggern, founder of Futureproof Music School, takes another angle:

“AI can offload the tedious parts of music production so students spend more time listening, making decisions and finishing work.”

At his school, students must submit their entire workflow, not just the finished product, ensuring teachers can track how they worked, not just what they submitted.

The Shift: Agency, Process, and Personalization

Educators are converging on a new principle: if assignments give students agency — the power to make choices, shape vision, and own outcomes — then low-effort AI answers just won’t cut it.

Used wisely, AI can “supercharge” learning by compressing feedback loops from days to seconds and acting as a 24/7 personal tutor. Von Seggern calls this “true personalization at scale.”

🧪 AI Tools Built for Education

AI developers are moving fast to meet demand:

Anthropic launched Claude for Education, which emphasizes guided exploration over direct answers, walking students through problem-solving instead of handing them solutions.

In July 2025, Anthropic formed a Higher Education Advisory Board with leaders from Yale, Stanford, Michigan, Texas, and Rice to ensure alignment with academic values.

Early research shows nearly half of student-AI interactions are still just direct answer-seeking, highlighting risks of overdependence.

The Takeaway

AI is not leaving the classroom. Instead, it’s forcing schools to evolve faster than at any point in decades. The new era of education will hinge on how well students, teachers, and AI developers can balance convenience with critical thinking.

In short: AI can be a crutch, or it can be a catalyst. The difference depends on how it’s used — and how educators adapt.

Bitcoin ($112,827) enters the second week of September sitting below crucial resistance — and traders are bracing for potential double-digit corrections.

Key Market Signals

Resistance at $112K: BTC/USD stalled under this level over the weekend. If range lows flip to resistance, traders eye $106.7K as the next liquidity target.

Bearish Scenarios: Analysts warn of a possible 10% pullback, with some cycle models even pointing to $87K as a -30% correction from the $124K ATH.

CPI + Fed Risk: Inflation prints (PPI & CPI) land midweek, with markets betting on a September Fed rate cut. Any surprise here could jolt crypto.

Whales Back in Bear Mode

CryptoQuant data shows whales offloading 100K+ BTC (~$11B) in the past month — the heaviest distribution since 2022’s bear market. This persistent selling is capping upside momentum and pressuring spot price action.

Institutional Flows: BTC vs. ETH

The much-discussed “rotation” into Ether looks over:

Bitcoin ETPs: +$444M inflows last week

Ether ETPs: -$900M outflows
Even US spot ETFs echoed the trend, with Bitcoin funds gaining $250M while Ether products bled $750M.

️ Futures Market Red Flags

On Binance, the Taker Buy/Sell Ratio is dropping while BTC price expands — a divergence often seen near market tops. Analysts caution:

“If liquidity doesn’t recover despite positive catalysts, the situation could become serious.”

Takeaway

Bitcoin is caught between institutional accumulation and whale distribution. With CPI week and Fed policy in play, the next few sessions may decide whether BTC defends the $100K line or slips toward a deeper correction.

A massive supply chain hack targeting JavaScript software libraries has shaken the crypto world — but so far, hackers have only managed to steal around $50 worth of crypto.

What happened?
Hackers compromised the NPM (node package manager) account of a popular developer and injected malware into libraries downloaded over 1 billion times. These packages — including widely used utilities like chalk, strip-ansi, and color-convert — are buried deep inside countless projects, potentially exposing crypto apps built on Ethereum and Solana.

The damage (so far):

$0.05 stolen in ETH

About $20 in memecoins (BRETT, ANDY, DORK, VISTA, GONDOLA)

One malicious wallet address flagged: 0xFc4a48

Crypto intelligence platform Security Alliance called it a baffling case:

“It’s like finding the keycard to Fort Knox and using it as a bookmark.”

Why it matters:

Supply chain hacks are dangerous because developers can get infected even without directly installing the compromised packages.

The malware was a crypto-clipper, designed to replace wallet addresses during transactions.

Luckily, most major apps (Ledger, MetaMask, Uniswap, Phantom Wallet, Blockstream Jade, etc.) confirmed they were unaffected.

️ Who’s at risk?
Only projects that updated after the infected packages were published and whose users approve malicious transactions may be exposed. Still, experts advise extra caution when signing onchain transactions until devs confirm their dependencies are clean.

Takeaway:
This could have been a multi-million dollar disaster, but instead turned into a $50 blip. The scare highlights how fragile open-source supply chains can be — and why every crypto user should always double-check addresses and approvals.

A massive supply chain hack targeting JavaScript software libraries has shaken the crypto world — but so far, hackers have only managed to steal around $50 worth of crypto.

What happened?
Hackers compromised the NPM (node package manager) account of a popular developer and injected malware into libraries downloaded over 1 billion times. These packages — including widely used utilities like chalk, strip-ansi, and color-convert — are buried deep inside countless projects, potentially exposing crypto apps built on Ethereum and Solana.

The damage (so far):

$0.05 stolen in ETH

About $20 in memecoins (BRETT, ANDY, DORK, VISTA, GONDOLA)

One malicious wallet address flagged: 0xFc4a48

Crypto intelligence platform Security Alliance called it a baffling case:

“It’s like finding the keycard to Fort Knox and using it as a bookmark.”

Why it matters:

Supply chain hacks are dangerous because developers can get infected even without directly installing the compromised packages.

The malware was a crypto-clipper, designed to replace wallet addresses during transactions.

Luckily, most major apps (Ledger, MetaMask, Uniswap, Phantom Wallet, Blockstream Jade, etc.) confirmed they were unaffected.

️ Who’s at risk?
Only projects that updated after the infected packages were published and whose users approve malicious transactions may be exposed. Still, experts advise extra caution when signing onchain transactions until devs confirm their dependencies are clean.

Takeaway:
This could have been a multi-million dollar disaster, but instead turned into a $50 blip. The scare highlights how fragile open-source supply chains can be — and why every crypto user should always double-check addresses and approvals.

AI has been a dominant theme for months, but some traders may think the robots are getting tired.

Today’s idea highlights a few key stocks in the technology sector associated with the trend.

First is Microsoft, which jumped on July 31 after strong results but failed to hold. It subsequently made a series of lower highs, and is now breaking the bottom of that triangle.

MSFT also closed under its 21-day exponential moving average for the first time since mid-April. MACD has been falling as well. Those signals may suggest its short-term trend has morphed from positive to negative.

Palantir has performed similarly. The software company gapped to new highs but then failed to hold and is now lower than it was the day of the news:

Third, Advanced Micro Devices more than doubled between late March and mid-August. But this weekly chart shows it stalling at $187.28, a peak from April 2024:

Finally, MSFT, PLTR and AMD are some of the most active underliers in the options market. That could help some traders take positions with calls and puts.

The mother of all KPIs.

Elon Musk has a new carrot dangling in front of him, and it’s not a Mars colony or a flamethrower.

Tesla’s board is asking investors to approve a bonus so massive, so absurd, so galaxy-brained, that it makes past compensation packages look like pocket change.

Ready? We’re talking about the potential for a $1 trillion payday if Musk manages to drag Tesla to an $8.5 trillion valuation. In ten years.

That’s nearly eight times where it is today. So let’s unpack just how unhinged this deal really is, why Tesla stock popped on the news, and what it would take for Musk to collect.

The Trillion-Dollar Tease

Tesla stock
TSLA
climbed 3.6% Friday on the back of this announcement, not because anything happened then and there, but because something could happen ten years out.

The board dropped the proposal in a securities filing, outlining that Musk could receive up to 423 million shares – worth over $1 trillion – if Tesla smashes through a series of market cap and operational milestones.

In other words, the board is looking to lock Musk in and make sure he doesn’t get distracted by rocket launches, robot brains, or tweeting memes about NPCs at 2 a.m.

What’s the Catch?

The catch is that this isn’t free money. To claim the full $1 trillion, Musk has to lead Tesla into uncharted corporate territory:
Boost Tesla’s market cap from $1 trillion to $8.5 trillion by 2035. That’s more than double Nvidia’s
NVDA
current valuation ($4.2 trillion) and equal to the GDP of Japan, Germany, and the UK, combined.
Deliver 12 million more EVs (as of this summer, Tesla has managed about 8 million in its entire history).
Land 10 million autonomous driving subscriptions.
Register and operate 1 million robotaxis (Not on the market right now).
Sell 1 million AI robots (Not on the market right now).
Increase adjusted earnings from $13 billion to $400 billion. That’s a 24x jump in profit.
Next stop? Tesla’s earnings report (Earnings Calendar for reference) in about a month from now.

🪄 The Board’s Spin

Tesla Chair Robyn Denholm called the package “fundamental to Tesla becoming the most valuable company in history.” Translation: Elon, please.

In a letter to shareholders, the board said the award “aligns extraordinary long-term shareholder value with incentives that will drive peak performance from our visionary leader.”

Which is corporate-speak for: We know he’s mercurial, but this should keep him tethered for at least a decade.

The Stakes for Tesla

Tesla’s stock reaction says investors are cautiously optimistic – emphasis on cautiously. Shares have been down nearly 30% since mid-December, plagued by slowing EV sales, rising competition, and Musk’s very public political feuds (including an ongoing rift with President Trump that’s cost Tesla federal EV incentives).

To make matters trickier, Tesla’s brand halo isn’t as shiny as it used to be. EV rivals like BYD, Rivian, Hyundai, and Mercedes are cutting into Tesla’s dominance, while price cuts have compressed margins.

Analysts expect Tesla to deliver 1.6 million vehicles this year, down from last year’s totals. On top of that, revenue continues to slide, lower by 12% in the last quarter, indicating a shrinking business.

So why the big gamble? Because if this plan works, Tesla wouldn’t just catch up – it would become the undisputed king of EVs, autonomous driving, AI robotics, and energy storage. In other words, a full-blown tech empire.

Musk’s 25% Solution

Part of Musk’s motivation here isn’t just about the money – though a trillion-dollar payday to one person is actually insane. Musk has repeatedly said he wants at least 25% voting control over Tesla to feel “comfortable” keeping his focus there.

Under the proposed plan, if Musk hits every target, his stake in Tesla would rise to 25% from his current holdings of 12%, giving him outsized influence over its future direction. That means if Tesla’s valuation is at $8.5 trillion, he’d be holding shares worth $2.12 trillion. But if he misses? He gets nothing. Zero.

It’s a high-wire act for both Musk and shareholders: reward him with historic wealth if he delivers, but don’t overpay if he falls short.

Robotaxis, Humanoids, and AI Dreams

A key piece of this plan hinges on Musk’s boldest vision yet: turning Tesla into an autonomous AI platform. Forget just cars – think fleets of robotaxis generating recurring subscription revenue and Optimus humanoid robots replacing repetitive labor in warehouses, factories, and maybe even households.

If this strategy pays off, Tesla won’t just be an automaker – it’ll be an AI-powered infrastructure company. But right now, that future is priced into a present that still depends on selling Model Ys and Cybertrucks.

The Market’s Split Personality

Wall Street’s reaction has been mixed, and here’s why:
The bulls argue that Tesla has the innovation engine, the brand, and, yes, the Musk factor to make the impossible happen. They point to SpaceX’s reusable rockets and Nvidia’s AI dominance as proof that moonshots sometimes land.
The bears see the trillion-dollar pay package as monopoly money that’ll never be real. Between slowing EV demand, Tesla’s underwhelming Q2 deliveries, and Musk’s penchant for side quests, they’re skeptical Tesla can hit even half of these KPIs.
The Bottom Line

Tesla’s proposed Musk mega-package is nothing short of audacious. It’s an all-in bet on:
Explosive growth in EVs and autonomous driving
Turning Tesla into an AI + robotics powerhouse
Keeping Musk’s focus locked on Tesla instead of Mars, memes, or political campaigns
Is the plan bold? Absolutely. Is it risky? Without a doubt.

Off to you: Do you believe Musk deserves the “One-Trillion-Dollar Man” (or $2T) title? Or is all that a desperate move to keep him around? Share your thoughts in the comments!

BTC enters September post-ATH with a seasonal headwind. Base case: a ~10% A-leg dip toward $108k, a B-bounce into ~$122k, then a C-flush near ~$94k—echoing April’s ABC rhythm. Once complete, the uptrend should re-assert into year-end. #Bitcoin #Seasonality #Crypto

🟠 Bitcoin September Outlook: Seasonality vs. Structure
After a fresh ATH, September’s historical bias skews mildly red. Base case is a ~10% A-leg dip that develops into an A/B/C correction before trend continuation. Think controlled pullback → consolidation → next markup. ️️

️ Seasonality Snapshot (2015–2024)
• Mean (10-yr): −2.55% · Median: −4.52%
• Red months: 6/10
• Worst September: 2019 (−13.88%)
• Best September: 2024 (+7.39%)
• Last 3 yrs avg: +2.8% (2024 +7.39%, 2023 +3.99%, 2022 −3.09%)
• Last 5 yrs avg (2020–2024): −1.3%
Read: September has tended to be weak, but the last two years printed green. Seasonality is a headwind—not a handbrake. ️

🧩 Structure Thesis (Fractal Analog)
You’re looking for a repeat of April 2025’s A/B/C rhythm—scaled up:
• April 2025 reference: A ≈ $92k → B ≈ $106k → C ≈ $80k
• Now (projected):
o A ≈ $108k (≈ 10% pullback from recent highs)
o B ≈ $122k (relief rally / lower high)
o C ≈ $94k (final flush into demand, completing the correction) 🧱
Interpretation: A measured September fade aligns with the A-leg. A reflexive B-bounce can follow as funding resets and late longs get cleaned up, with a C-leg completing the pattern before the next expansion.

How Seasonality Supports the Call
• Typical drag: Median −4.5% and multiple red Septembers justify a down-bias.
• Volatility window: The historical 21-point spread (best +7.39% vs worst −13.88%) means a 10% dip sits well within normal bounds.
• Cycle context: With a new ATH just printed, a shallow corrective phase is constructive—not bearish regime change.

🧭 Levels & Triggers
• Bias line: Momentum cools into $108k → watch for seller absorption and open interest reset.
• Relief cap: $122k acts as B-rally resistance; sustained closes above $122k would invalidate the ABC idea and argue for immediate continuation.
• Completion zone: $94k (C) is the buy-the-dip completion area; clean breaks below raise risk of a deeper time correction rather than a swift V-reversal. ️

🧪 What to Monitor (Confirmation/Invalidation)
• Liquidity & OI: De-leveraging into A, controlled OI rebuild into B, washout into C.
• Spot-ETF flows / stablecoin issuance: Weakening into A, stabilizing by late month supports B→C rhythm.
• Funding/basis: Overheated → normalize during A; negative spikes near C often mark capitulation.
• Breadth (alts): Underperform into A/C; broad risk-on breadth usually returns post-C.

Base Case Path (Textbook)
September: drift to $108k (A) → bounce toward $122k (B) → final tag of ~$94k (C) → reset + markup into Q4.
(If price reclaims and holds above $122k early, treat that as trend continuation—not a correction.)

Risk Notes
• Seasonality is a tendency, not a rule. Macro catalysts (CPI, policy, liquidity) can dominate calendar effects.
• This is market commentary, not financial advice. Manage risk and invalidation levels. ️

Hello traders, I want share with you my opinion about Bitcoin. The market for Bitcoin has been undergoing a lengthy corrective phase, with the price action methodically descending since its last major peak. This bearish price action has been contained within a large downward pennant, a classic reversal pattern that suggests the preceding downtrend is losing momentum as volatility contracts. The price for BTC has been squeezed between the descending resistance line and an ascending support line. Currently, the asset is at a critical inflection point, as it is directly testing this ascending support line after a recent rejection from the upper boundary of the pattern. The primary working hypothesis is a long scenario, predicated on a bullish resolution from this dynamic support. The expectation is that buyers will defend this ascending support line, initiating a powerful rebound that is strong enough to cause a breakout above the pennant's main resistance line. This would signal a reversal of the recent downtrend. Therefore, the TP is logically placed at 115000 points, a prudent intermediate target aiming for a key area of prior price consolidation. Please share this idea with your friends and click Boost

For the first time ever, Huawei has overtaken Apple in global smartwatch shipments, claiming the #1 spot worldwide in Q2 2025, according to Counterpoint Research.

Market Recovery Underway

Global smartwatch shipments grew 8% year-over-year, signaling a rebound after sluggish demand in previous quarters.

Huawei’s shipments surged 52% YoY, giving it a 21% market share.

Apple slipped to 17%, losing the crown it has held for years.

Why Huawei Won This Round

Analysts point to three key factors behind Huawei’s rise:

Broad product lineup covering multiple price segments.

Strong domestic demand — over 75% of shipments went to China.

Competitive pricing, helping Huawei win budget-conscious consumers.

The Top 5 (Q2 2025)

Huawei → 21% share (+52% YoY)

Apple → 17% share (decline YoY)

Xiaomi → 9% share (+38%)

imoo (kids’ smartwatches) → 7% share (+21%)

Samsung → 6% share (-3%)

Analysts note that Apple and Samsung’s drop partly comes from users delaying purchases while waiting for next-gen models expected later this year.

Takeaway

Huawei’s climb marks a major shift in the smartwatch landscape. While Apple and Samsung are still strong contenders, China-driven growth + aggressive pricing is reshaping the global leaderboard.

Do you think Huawei can hold onto the #1 spot once Apple launches its next lineup, or is this just a temporary shake-up?

In a landmark ruling out of India, a special anti-corruption court in Ahmedabad has sentenced 14 people to life imprisonment over a crypto-related kidnapping and extortion plot dating back to 2018.

The Convicted

11 police officers, including ex-Amreli superintendent of police Jagdish Patel (an IPS officer).

Former BJP MLA Nalin Kotadiya, who allegedly masterminded the plan.

Several others involved in the operation.

All were found guilty of:

Criminal conspiracy

Kidnapping for ransom

Illegal detention & assault

Misconduct under the Prevention of Corruption Act

🧩 The Backstory

Victim: Surat businessman Shailesh Bhatt, who had invested in the infamous BitConnect ($900M Ponzi that collapsed).

Bhatt reportedly recovered part of his lost investment from BitConnect dev Dhaval Mavani in the form of 752 BTC.

Word spread, and Kotadiya + senior officers plotted to seize the funds.

On Feb 11, 2018, Bhatt was:

Kidnapped and held at Keshav Farm, near Gandhinagar.

Beaten and coerced into admitting he had BTC stashed with an associate.

Forced to part with 34 BTC (~$150K) and $3.6M cash after threats and extortion.

️ The Trial & Judgment

Bhatt later escalated the case to India’s Union Home Ministry, triggering a full probe.

The prosecution called 173 witnesses.

The court not only issued life sentences but also ordered the confiscation of gold ornaments seized from SP Patel, to be transferred to the Mumbai Mint.

Why It Matters

This is one of the first major crypto-related corruption rulings in India that directly implicates law enforcement and political figures. It underscores:

How crypto’s pseudonymous nature can attract criminal targeting.

The risks of state actors misusing power in the absence of robust oversight.

The growing seriousness with which Indian courts are treating crypto-related crime.

Question for discussion: Do cases like this highlight the need for stricter crypto regulation, or is the bigger issue corruption and abuse of power by traditional authorities?

Bitcoin slid nearly 3% on Friday, dipping to local lows of $109,436, as suspicious whale activity sent ripples through the market.

The Whale Playbook in Action

Traders point the finger at large whale inflows to market makers like Wintermute.

“This isn’t noise. It’s the whale playbook,” noted trader Merlijn, flagging coordinated BTC + ETH moves.

The pattern feels familiar: consolidation → capitulation → breakout → rally.

Right now? We’re sitting in the capitulation phase, which some argue could last weeks but also offer juicy entries.

Adding to the drama, Keith Alan of Material Indicators revived his old nemesis: “Spoofy the Whale.” This entity allegedly manipulates order books with fake liquidity to steer price action and trap over-leveraged traders.

Liquidations Pile Up

In the past 24 hours, $350M in crypto longs were liquidated, amplifying volatility.

Bitcoin alone slid $3,000 within hours, flushing traders and triggering a sharp reset.

Macro Lens: PCE Inflation Incoming

Beyond whale games, traders now watch the US PCE Index — the Fed’s favorite inflation gauge.

A hotter-than-expected print could pressure risk assets further.

A cooler read might spark a relief rally heading into September’s anticipated rate cut.

As analyst Kyle Doops summed up:

“Fed’s favorite gauge could either fuel the dump… or light the relief rally.”

Takeaway

Between whale spoofing and macro headwinds, Bitcoin is wobbling under $110K. Whether this is a trap before the next breakout or the start of deeper pain may hinge less on whales… and more on Friday’s inflation data.

Question for the forum: Do you think “Spoofy the Whale” is really manipulating BTC, or are traders just using whales as a convenient scapegoat for macro-driven dips?

Bitcoin slid nearly 3% on Friday, dipping to local lows of $109,436, as suspicious whale activity sent ripples through the market.

The Whale Playbook in Action

Traders point the finger at large whale inflows to market makers like Wintermute.

“This isn’t noise. It’s the whale playbook,” noted trader Merlijn, flagging coordinated BTC + ETH moves.

The pattern feels familiar: consolidation → capitulation → breakout → rally.

Right now? We’re sitting in the capitulation phase, which some argue could last weeks but also offer juicy entries.

Adding to the drama, Keith Alan of Material Indicators revived his old nemesis: “Spoofy the Whale.” This entity allegedly manipulates order books with fake liquidity to steer price action and trap over-leveraged traders.

Liquidations Pile Up

In the past 24 hours, $350M in crypto longs were liquidated, amplifying volatility.

Bitcoin alone slid $3,000 within hours, flushing traders and triggering a sharp reset.

Macro Lens: PCE Inflation Incoming

Beyond whale games, traders now watch the US PCE Index — the Fed’s favorite inflation gauge.

A hotter-than-expected print could pressure risk assets further.

A cooler read might spark a relief rally heading into September’s anticipated rate cut.

As analyst Kyle Doops summed up:

“Fed’s favorite gauge could either fuel the dump… or light the relief rally.”

Takeaway

Between whale spoofing and macro headwinds, Bitcoin is wobbling under $110K. Whether this is a trap before the next breakout or the start of deeper pain may hinge less on whales… and more on Friday’s inflation data.

Question for the forum: Do you think “Spoofy the Whale” is really manipulating BTC, or are traders just using whales as a convenient scapegoat for macro-driven dips?

Dutch crypto service provider Amdax has secured €20 million (~$23.3M) in fresh funding to launch a dedicated Bitcoin treasury company on Amsterdam’s Euronext stock exchange.

Enter AMBTS

The new entity, called AMBTS, will operate independently with its own governance. Its bold target?

Accumulate at least 1% of all Bitcoin supply — that’s around 210,000 BTC, currently worth over $23B.

Grow Bitcoin per share for investors by leveraging capital markets and compounding BTC exposure over time.

In other words: AMBTS is positioning itself as a pure-play corporate Bitcoin accumulator.

Corporate Bitcoin Treasuries Are Booming

This isn’t happening in a vacuum. Ever since MicroStrategy (now “Strategy”) pioneered the corporate Bitcoin treasury model, companies across industries have been adding BTC to their balance sheets.

Some notable names beyond the usual suspects:

Tesla (EVs)

KULR Technology (thermal + battery safety)

Aker (Norwegian industrial investment)

Méliuz (Brazilian fintech)

MercadoLibre (LatAm e-commerce giant)

Samara (Malta investment manager)

Jasmine (Thai telecom)

Alliance Resource Partners (US coal producer)

Rumble (Canadian video platform)

Meanwhile, firms dedicated to Bitcoin accumulation keep scooping up supply, steadily reducing liquid BTC in circulation.

Global Bitcoin Accumulation Continues

The Amdax move comes on the heels of other major treasury plays this month:

Metaplanet (Japan): Approved an ~$880M raise, with ~$835M earmarked for Bitcoin.

Sequans (France): Filed for a $200M equity raise to fuel BTC strategy.

Strategy (fka MicroStrategy): Michael Saylor teased yet another August Bitcoin buy — the firm already holds 632,457 BTC (~$69.5B), over 3% of all future supply.

Takeaway

Amdax’s AMBTS isn’t just another treasury experiment — it’s aiming for a systemic position in Bitcoin’s supply dynamics. If successful, it could join Strategy in shaping how institutional capital interacts with BTC scarcity.

Question for the community: Do you see dedicated Bitcoin treasuries as a bullish supply sink… or are they centralizing too much BTC in too few hands?