yes, now I see, my mistake, thank you for explaining. Now everything is clear

UDS 25 000 staked is - 4 comments x UDS 5 x 1.5 === UDS 30.
Sure

This table doesn't work, or I don't understand something. I got UDS 30 when it should have been UDS 35 if x 1.5 if staked 25 000

The film underscores Bitcoin’s role as both a financial tool and a social movement.

#Solana update: $SOL at $215 after correcting to $212.

Whales moving ETH to exchanges always sparks short-term fear, but honestly the fundamentals look stronger than ever long-term.

When the bounty is this big, you know the exploit was massive.

@johnblockbuster
This report makes it crystal clear: the real laundromats are still banks, not blockchains. $312B in just four years through U.S. banks — and that’s only tied to Chinese networks. Compare that to all illicit crypto activity over five years ($189B), and it’s obvious where the bigger problem lies. Politicians keep blaming crypto because it’s easy to demonize and harder to understand, but the data doesn’t lie. If regulators really want to fight crime, they should focus on tightening fiat rails — not scapegoating an industry that makes up less than 1% of illicit financial flows.

A yen-backed digital economy could set new standards for global CBDC interoperability.

@lingriiddd
This is massive. If AMBTS really pushes toward 1% of BTC supply, the scarcity effect could be huge. We’ve seen what MicroStrategy did with only 3% — more dedicated treasuries piling in means retail supply keeps shrinking. Long-term, this is mega bullish for Bitcoin.

Florida’s pro-blockchain stance could make it a major American center for fintech innovation.

These shifting policies could shape how nations balance innovation with financial transparency.

Classic SBF move — trying to shift focus from accountability to timing. 🧠

Verification over validation — truth backed by code, not claims.

The numbers speak for themselves — $312B laundered through banks vs. $189B in crypto over 5 years. Yet, crypto is always painted as the big bad wolf. Reality check: fiat rails remain the backbone of global crime. Crypto is transparent by design, and blockchain forensics makes it traceable. The real laundering machine is still the traditional banking system.

10M RON buyback is huge! Short-term pump looks good, but sustained adoption is what really matters for long-term growth.

@AIcash
Really solid breakdown. The point about banks not being able to say “no” to stablecoins is spot on. Once the Genius Act framework gets implemented, it’s basically game over for legacy rails that can’t process them. Ethereum already dominates stablecoin settlement (USDC, USDT, PYUSD, etc.), and the composability factor makes it nearly impossible for smaller chains to catch up quickly. If you think about it, ETH becoming the default “Wall Street token” isn’t just speculation — it’s happening in real time with corporates adding billions to their treasuries. The narrative has definitely shifted.

Finally! A big traditional player testing stablecoins — this could change remittances forever.

This split was inevitable. Bitcoin has always carried two visions: hard money vs. programmable canvas. Now Taproot + inscriptions are forcing the community to pick sides.

Noise complaints today, zoning laws tomorrow — local pushback is real. 🧱