How is TON positioned for long-term economic sustainability?

[chainsniff]

TON’s economics rely on storage fees, gas fees, and validator rewards, all paid in TON. Storage rent incentivizes efficient onchain state usage, preventing long-term bloat — a key issue on older chains.

With Telegram acting as a distribution layer rather than a controlling entity, TON benefits from massive user access without protocol-level centralization. As more payments, mini-apps, and tokenized assets move onchain, TON’s fee model scales with usage while maintaining predictable costs for power users.

[JanEmil]

Chaos system in my eyes. You no idea what you do in all the apps and mini games.

[Capybara_Capybara]

Scaling economics matter more than hype.

[Revenant]

Storage rent is an underrated design choice.

[The_Walking_Dead]

Predictable fees are a real advantage at scale.