Proposal Faces Exploit, Community Split Deepens

[ed]

Even as Dashjr said the fork has no technical objections, cryptographer Peter Todd claimed to have found a loophole, recording the full proposal text in a “100% valid” transaction under the same rules.
Meanwhile, BitMEX Research warned that attackers could embed illegal content to force reorgs and double-spend, adding new pressure to address on-chain liability — and reigniting debate over censorship vs. security in Bitcoin’s future.

[Abdul Khan]

An exploit right after a proposal? That’s bound to divide the community even further. ️

[alex10]

It’s tough watching a promising proposal fall apart due to security flaws and internal conflict. 🧩