🚨 Crypto ATMs: Ban or Build Smarter? 🚨

[kevin1]

More than 55M Americans now use crypto in daily life — and just like traditional ATMs, Bitcoin kiosks have become part of the financial landscape. But with growth comes risk: scammers have learned to exploit these machines, tricking victims into irreversible deposits. Losses via crypto ATM fraud hit $246.7M in 2024, nearly doubling year-over-year.

Some localities, like Spokane, WA, have responded with blanket bans. But banning kiosks to stop scams is like banning email to fight phishing. Fraud exploits humans, not the technology.

A better path exists.

Real-time warnings at kiosks: alerts that transactions can’t be reversed, tailored fraud prompts (“Are you being pressured by ‘law enforcement’ to send funds?”).
Regulatory standards: Require operators to implement fraud detection + clear consumer warnings as part of their licensing.
Proactive compliance: Some towns, like Grosse Pointe Farms, MI, have already introduced registration and warning rules — before a problem arises.
Learning from TradFi: Wire transfers, ATMs, and gift card sales all integrated similar safeguards, and fraud cases dropped.

️ Key point: Killing crypto ATMs won’t kill scams — it just pushes victims toward worse alternatives and strips access from millions of law-abiding users.

The smarter approach is to preserve the rails while hardening them. Consumers stay protected. Innovation continues. Fraudsters lose their easiest vector.

Should regulators treat crypto ATMs as a liability to ban — or as a tool to improve with the right safeguards?

[Maxwell]

Banning crypto ATMs won’t stop scams — it’ll just hurt real users. Smarter safeguards are the way forward

[rafihasan]

Just like banks added warnings to wires and ATMs, crypto kiosks can evolve too. Education + compliance beats prohibition

[Nahiar806]

Fraudsters exploit people, not machines. Let’s harden crypto ATMs with real-time alerts instead of shutting them down