SBF’s Defense Claims Evidence Was Silenced

[ed]

SBF’s legal team argues the jury never saw the full picture of FTX’s collapse. Shapiro claims:

FTX and Alameda were solvent at the time of the crisis.

The collapse was caused by a liquidity crunch, not insolvency.

Key evidence and expert testimony were blocked by the court.

If the appeal succeeds, SBF’s case could be sent back for a new trial, reopening one of the most high-profile fraud cases in crypto history.

[Nahid Hossen]

If that’s true, this case could get messy fast. Transparency matters here.

[EmTeam]

Classic legal twist — always two sides to every billion-dollar story.