Prediction Markets Match Fed Forecast Accuracy as Regulatory Battle Heats Up

[bonk]

Prediction markets are gaining both credibility and controversy as new research suggests they may rival traditional economic forecasting models over multi-month horizons.

Recent analysis found that forecasts implied by Kalshi for the federal funds target rate produced an average absolute error over roughly 150 days comparable to projections from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Survey of Professional Forecasters. In practical terms, crowd-based market bets about three Federal Reserve meetings ahead were about as accurate as predictions from leading economists.

However, as prediction markets gain legitimacy, regulatory tensions are escalating. Michael Selig, chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, declared the agency’s intention to assert exclusive federal oversight over prediction markets, filing an amicus brief in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in the legal dispute between Crypto.com and the Nevada Gaming Control Board.

The case centers on whether federal commodities law preempts state gaming regulations. Nevada previously blocked Crypto.com’s sports event contracts, labeling them unlicensed gambling, while the company argues its products qualify as federally regulated derivatives. Former CFTC Chairman Chris Giancarlo has also weighed in, warning that expanded state intervention could fracture the national derivatives framework.

[chainsniff]

prediction markets matching fed economists is wild imagine trusting kalshi over a phd