The Oscars Have Banned AI-Generated Performances and Scripts From Award Eligibility
-

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has updated its rules to explicitly exclude AI-generated content from Oscar eligibility, establishing that only performances credited in a film's legal billing and demonstrably performed by humans with their consent will qualify for Academy Awards. Screenplays must also be human-authored to be eligible, and the Academy has reserved the right to request additional information about a film's AI usage and the extent of human authorship behind any submitted work. The changes formalize what had been an implicit industry assumption and draw a clear line at a moment when the boundary between human and AI creative contribution is becoming increasingly difficult to define.
The timing is not coincidental. An independent film featuring an AI-generated version of Val Kilmer is currently in production, AI actress Tilly Norwood has been generating headlines, and new video generation models are enabling production approaches that were not technically possible even a year ago. The Academy's rules arrive as other creative industries draw similar lines: publishers have pulled books over AI authorship concerns, and science fiction writers' groups have declared AI-assisted work ineligible for their awards. AI was also a central sticking point in the actors' and writers' strikes of 2023, making the Oscar rule changes a continuation of a labor and creative rights debate that the industry has been working through for several years. For studios and filmmakers, the rules provide clarity about what kinds of AI use are permissible in award-contending films, though the Academy's right to request information about AI usage means the enforcement questions around edge cases and degrees of AI involvement remain to be tested in practice.