<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Why Does the Ethereum Foundation Keep Selling ETH and Is It a Problem?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><img src="/forum/assets/uploads/files/1777206286381-142848b3-3193-4861-80cb-a2dc1a6ed2e3-image.png" alt="142848b3-3193-4861-80cb-a2dc1a6ed2e3-image.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto">Q: Why does the Ethereum Foundation sell ETH if it believes in Ethereum's future?<br />
The foundation's treasury management policy was designed specifically to remove ambiguity from these transactions and prevent the kind of speculation that has historically followed foundation wallet movements. Sales are not a sign of lost confidence — they are scheduled operational necessities. Every three months, the foundation reviews its treasury against a target operating buffer and determines how much ETH, if any, needs to be sold to maintain its fiat reserves. Most recently, the foundation sold 10,000 ETH to Bitmine Immersion Technologies in an OTC deal worth approximately $23.87 million, with proceeds going directly toward protocol research, ecosystem development, and grants.<br />
Q: Why does the community react negatively to Ethereum Foundation ETH sales?<br />
Foundation sales have historically triggered short-term price sensitivity among ETH holders who interpret them as a bearish signal. Critics have argued that a foundation which created ETH but consistently sells it sends a mixed message to the market. The shift to OTC transactions with disclosed counterparties is partly designed to address this — by making the sale public and transparent before speculation starts, the foundation aims to reduce the market impact and the narrative damage that comes with unexplained wallet movements.<br />
Q: What concerns exist about the foundation's governance and neutrality?<br />
Critics of the foundation's 38-page mandate argued it was overly philosophical and failed to address Ethereum's need to compete for real-world adoption, particularly as institutional interest in blockchain grows. On the staking side, Vitalik Buterin has cautioned that large-scale staking by the foundation could complicate neutrality during potential contentious hard forks, where competing chains may emerge. The tension between staying neutral and taking an active role in steering Ethereum's development remains one of the most debated questions surrounding the foundation's evolving mandate.</p>
]]></description><link>https://undeads.com/forum/topic/19068/why-does-the-ethereum-foundation-keep-selling-eth-and-is-it-a-problem</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 05:50:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://undeads.com/forum/topic/19068.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 12:24:49 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why Does the Ethereum Foundation Keep Selling ETH and Is It a Problem? on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 22:16:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The shift to OTC transactions with disclosed</p>
]]></description><link>https://undeads.com/forum/post/52380</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://undeads.com/forum/post/52380</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ChewBeast]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 22:16:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why Does the Ethereum Foundation Keep Selling ETH and Is It a Problem? on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:28:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Transparent OTC sales: because nothing reduces panic like announcing the exit before doing the exit</p>
]]></description><link>https://undeads.com/forum/post/52294</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://undeads.com/forum/post/52294</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[encrypted]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:28:26 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>