<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Are permission limits enough to keep AI agents secure?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><img src="/forum/assets/uploads/files/1776860815541-91564312-6d0e-4462-8157-4d65fa536b27-image.png" alt="91564312-6d0e-4462-8157-4d65fa536b27-image.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /><br />
Not entirely. While permission controls reduce risk, they don’t solve deeper infrastructure issues. According to specialists at 0G Labs, vulnerabilities can still exist in the underlying compute layer.</p>
<p dir="auto">If the system running the agent is compromised, sensitive data like private keys or trading strategies could be exposed. That’s why there’s growing emphasis on hardware-level isolation — ensuring that even system operators cannot access or leak critical information.</p>
]]></description><link>https://undeads.com/forum/topic/18858/are-permission-limits-enough-to-keep-ai-agents-secure</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 06:10:12 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://undeads.com/forum/topic/18858.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 12:27:01 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are permission limits enough to keep AI agents secure? on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 15:28:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">researchers at 0G Labs highlight that even with permissioned agents, risks persist at the compute and infrastructure layer rather than just the application layer</p>
]]></description><link>https://undeads.com/forum/post/51555</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://undeads.com/forum/post/51555</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lingriiddd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 15:28:12 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>