<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Circle Defends USDC Freeze Policy After Criticism]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><img src="/forum/assets/uploads/files/1775992748480-c4493f58-aed3-4666-9307-01523c3ebf1a-image.png" alt="c4493f58-aed3-4666-9307-01523c3ebf1a-image.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /><br />
Circle has responded to criticism over its handling of the Drift exploit, defending its ability to freeze USDC as a legal obligation—not a discretionary action. Chief Strategy Officer Dante Disparte emphasized that freezes only occur when required by law.</p>
<p dir="auto">The response follows accusations from onchain investigator ZachXBT, who claimed Circle failed to act while stolen funds moved across chains. Circle argues that legal constraints, not unwillingness, limit how quickly it can intervene during active exploits.</p>
]]></description><link>https://undeads.com/forum/topic/18347/circle-defends-usdc-freeze-policy-after-criticism</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 07:26:50 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://undeads.com/forum/topic/18347.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 11:19:10 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Circle Defends USDC Freeze Policy After Criticism on Sun, 12 Apr 2026 13:37:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">circle’s response highlights the trade-off between compliance and speed in stablecoin systems</p>
]]></description><link>https://undeads.com/forum/post/49707</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://undeads.com/forum/post/49707</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bonk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 13:37:24 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>