<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The SEC May Be Redefining What Counts as a Security]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><img src="/forum/assets/uploads/files/1774334510709-2eb954f9-2f13-413b-a50a-3813129f4c28-image.png" alt="2eb954f9-2f13-413b-a50a-3813129f4c28-image.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto">The SEC has sent new guidance to the White House that could reshape how crypto assets are classified under US law. The proposal suggests that categories like digital commodities, NFTs, tools, and stablecoins may not be treated as securities, signaling a potential shift in regulatory approach.</p>
<p dir="auto">If finalized, this could bring much-needed clarity to the industry and reduce uncertainty for builders and investors. It may also act as a temporary framework while lawmakers work toward a broader crypto market structure bill.</p>
]]></description><link>https://undeads.com/forum/topic/17382/the-sec-may-be-redefining-what-counts-as-a-security</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 12:51:31 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://undeads.com/forum/topic/17382.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 06:41:51 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The SEC May Be Redefining What Counts as a Security on Tue, 24 Mar 2026 10:42:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">the sec’s evolving stance on asset classification suggests a potential move toward a more nuanced regulatory framework</p>
]]></description><link>https://undeads.com/forum/post/46094</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://undeads.com/forum/post/46094</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 10:42:35 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>